The only agent that thinks for itself

Autonomous Monitoring with self-learning AI built-in, operating independently across your entire stack.

Unlimited Metrics & Logs
Machine learning & MCP
5% CPU, 150MB RAM
3GB disk, >1 year retention
800+ integrations, zero config
Dashboards, alerts out of the box
> Discover Netdata Agents

Centralized metrics streaming and storage

Aggregate metrics from multiple agents into centralized Parent nodes for unified monitoring across your infrastructure.

Stream from unlimited agents
Long-term data retention
High availability clustering
Data replication & backup
Scalable architecture
Enterprise-grade security
> Learn about Parents

Fully managed cloud platform

Access your monitoring data from anywhere with our SaaS platform. No infrastructure to manage, automatic updates, and global availability.

Zero infrastructure management
99.9% uptime SLA
Global data centers
Automatic updates & patches
Enterprise SSO & RBAC
SOC2 & ISO certified
> Explore Netdata Cloud

Deploy Netdata Cloud in your infrastructure

Run the full Netdata Cloud platform on-premises for complete data sovereignty and compliance with your security policies.

Complete data sovereignty
Air-gapped deployment
Custom compliance controls
Private network integration
Dedicated support team
Kubernetes & Docker support
> Learn about Cloud On-Premises

Powerful, intuitive monitoring interface

Modern, responsive UI built for real-time troubleshooting with customizable dashboards and advanced visualization capabilities.

Real-time chart updates
Customizable dashboards
Dark & light themes
Advanced filtering & search
Responsive on all devices
Collaboration features
> Explore Netdata UI

Monitor on the go

Native iOS and Android apps bring full monitoring capabilities to your mobile device with real-time alerts and notifications.

iOS & Android apps
Push notifications
Touch-optimized interface
Offline data access
Biometric authentication
Widget support
> Download apps

The future of infrastructure observability

See our strategic direction across AI-native observability, full-stack signals, operational intelligence, and enterprise platform maturity.

AI-native observability
Full-stack signal coverage
Operational intelligence
Enterprise platform maturity
Agent releases every 6 weeks
Cloud continuous delivery
> Explore Product Roadmap

Best energy efficiency

True real-time per-second

100% automated zero config

Centralized observability

Multi-year retention

High availability built-in

Zero maintenance

Always up-to-date

Enterprise security

Complete data control

Air-gap ready

Compliance certified

Millisecond responsiveness

Infinite zoom & pan

Works on any device

Native performance

Instant alerts

Monitor anywhere

AI-native observability

Continuous delivery

Open source foundation

80% Faster Incident Resolution

AI-powered troubleshooting from detection, to root cause and blast radius identification, to reporting.

True Real-Time and Simple, even at Scale

Linearly and infinitely scalable full-stack observability, that can be deployed even mid-crisis.

90% Cost Reduction, Full Fidelity

Instead of centralizing the data, Netdata distributes the code, eliminating pipelines and complexity.

See and Map Your Entire Network

Live topology, flow analytics, and SNMP device and trap monitoring — unified with your full-stack observability.

Control Without Surrender

SOC 2 Type 2 certified with every metric kept on your infrastructure.

Integrations

800+ collectors and notification channels, auto-discovered and ready out of the box.

800+ data collectors
Auto-discovery & zero config
Cloud, infra, app protocols
Notifications out of the box
> Explore integrations
Real Results
46% Cost Reduction

Reduced monitoring costs by 46% while cutting staff overhead by 67%.

— Leonardo Antunez, Codyas

Zero Pipeline

No data shipping. No central storage costs. Query at the edge.

From Our Users
"Out-of-the-Box"

So many out-of-the-box features! I mostly don't have to develop anything.

— Simon Beginn, LANCOM Systems

No Query Language

Point-and-click troubleshooting. No PromQL, no LogQL, no learning curve.

Enterprise Ready
67% Less Staff, 46% Cost Cut

Enterprise efficiency without enterprise complexity—real ROI from day one.

— Leonardo Antunez, Codyas

SOC 2 Type 2 Certified

Zero data egress. Only metadata reaches the cloud. Your metrics stay on your infrastructure.

Full Coverage
800+ Collectors

Auto-discovered and configured. No manual setup required.

Any Notification Channel

Slack, PagerDuty, Teams, email, webhooks—all built-in.

Built for the People Who Get Paged

Because 3am alerts deserve instant answers, not hour-long hunts.

Every Industry Has Rules. We Master Them.

See how healthcare, finance, and government teams cut monitoring costs 90% while staying audit-ready.

Monitor Any Technology. Configure Nothing.

Install the agent. It already knows your stack.
From Our Users
"A Rare Unicorn"

Netdata gives more than you invest in it. A rare unicorn that obeys the Pareto rule.

— Eduard Porquet Mateu, TMB Barcelona

99% Downtime Reduction

Reduced website downtime by 99% and cloud bill by 30% using Netdata alerts.

— Falkland Islands Government

Real Savings
30% Cloud Cost Reduction

Optimized resource allocation based on Netdata alerts cut cloud spending by 30%.

— Falkland Islands Government

46% Cost Cut

Reduced monitoring staff by 67% while cutting operational costs by 46%.

— Codyas

Real Coverage
"Plugin for Everything"

Netdata has agent capacity or a plugin for everything, including Windows and Kubernetes.

— Eduard Porquet Mateu, TMB Barcelona

"Out-of-the-Box"

So many out-of-the-box features! I mostly don't have to develop anything.

— Simon Beginn, LANCOM Systems

Real Speed
Troubleshooting in 30 Seconds

From 2-3 minutes to 30 seconds—instant visibility into any node issue.

— Matthew Artist, Nodecraft

20% Downtime Reduction

20% less downtime and 40% budget optimization from out-of-the-box monitoring.

— Simon Beginn, LANCOM Systems

Pay per Node. Unlimited Everything Else.

One price per node. Unlimited metrics, logs, users, and retention. No per-GB surprises.

Free tier—forever
No metric limits or caps
Retention you control
Cancel anytime
> See pricing plans

What's Your Monitoring Really Costing You?

Most teams overpay by 40-60%. Let's find out why.

Expose hidden metric charges
Calculate tool consolidation
Customers report 30-67% savings
Results in under 60 seconds
> See what you're really paying

Your Infrastructure Is Unique. Let's Talk.

Because monitoring 10 nodes is different from monitoring 10,000.

On-prem & air-gapped deployment
Volume pricing & agreements
Architecture review for your scale
Compliance & security support
> Start a conversation

Monitoring That Sells Itself

Deploy in minutes. Impress clients in hours. Earn recurring revenue for years.

30-second live demos close deals
Zero config = zero support burden
Competitive margins & deal protection
Response in 48 hours
> Apply to partner

Per-Second Metrics at Homelab Prices

Same engine, same dashboards, same ML. Just priced for tinkerers.

Community: Free forever · 5 nodes · non-commercial
Homelab: $90/yr · unlimited nodes · fair usage
> Get the Homelab Plan

$1,000 Per Referral. Unlimited Referrals.

Your colleagues get 10% off. You get 10% commission. Everyone wins.

10% of subscriptions, up to $1,000 each
Track earnings inside Netdata Cloud
PayPal/Venmo payouts in 3-4 weeks
No caps, no complexity
> Get your referral link
Cost Proof
40% Budget Optimization

"Netdata's significant positive impact" — LANCOM Systems

Calculate Your Savings

Compare vs Datadog, Grafana, Dynatrace

Savings Proof
46% Cost Reduction

"Cut costs by 46%, staff by 67%" — Codyas

30% Cloud Bill Savings

"Reduced cloud bill by 30%" — Falkland Islands Gov

Enterprise Proof
"Better Than Combined Alternatives"

"Better observability with Netdata than combining other tools." — TMB Barcelona

Real Engineers, <24h Response

DPA, SLAs, on-prem, volume pricing

Why Partners Win
Demo Live Infrastructure

One command, 30 seconds, real data—no sandbox needed

Zero Tickets, High Margins

Auto-config + per-node pricing = predictable profit

Homelab Ready
Free Video Course

8-episode Netdata tutorial by LearnLinux.tv

76k+ GitHub Stars

3rd most starred monitoring project

Worth Recommending
Product That Delivers

Customers report 40-67% cost cuts, 99% downtime reduction

Zero Risk to Your Rep

Free tier lets them try before they buy

AI Support Assistant, Available 24/7

Nedi has access to all official documentation, source code, and resources. Ask any question about Netdata—responds in your language.

Deployment & configuration
Troubleshooting & sizing
Alerts & notifications
Evidence-based answers
> Ask Nedi now

Never Fight Fires Alone

Docs, community, and expert help—pick your path to resolution.

Learn.netdata.cloud docs
Discord, Forums, GitHub
Premium support available
> Get answers now

60 Seconds to First Dashboard

One command to install. Zero config. 850+ integrations documented.

Linux, Windows, K8s, Docker
Auto-discovers your stack
> Read our documentation

76,000+ Engineers Strong

615+ contributors. 1.5M daily downloads. One mission: simplify observability.

Per-Second. 90% Cheaper. Data Stays Home.

Side-by-side comparisons: costs, real-time granularity, and data sovereignty for every major tool.

See why teams switch from Datadog, Prometheus, Grafana, and more.

> Browse all comparisons
Edge-Native Observability, Born Open Source
Per-second visibility, ML on every metric, and data that never leaves your infrastructure.
Founded in 2016
615+ contributors worldwide
Remote-first, engineering-driven
Open source first
> Read our story
Promises We Publish—and Prove
12 principles backed by open code, independent validation, and measurable outcomes.
Open source, peer-reviewed
Zero config, instant value
Data sovereignty by design
Aligned pricing, no surprises
> See all 12 principles
Edge-Native, AI-Ready, 100% Open
76k+ stars. Full ML, AI, and automation—GPLv3+, not premium add-ons.
76,000+ GitHub stars
GPLv3+ licensed forever
ML on every metric, included
Zero vendor lock-in
> Explore our open source
Build Real-Time Observability for the World
Remote-first team shipping per-second monitoring with ML on every metric.
Remote-first, fully distributed
Open source (76k+ stars)
Challenging technical problems
Your code on millions of systems
> See open roles
Meet the Team Behind Netdata
Conferences, meetups, and tradeshows where you can see Netdata in action and talk to the engineers who build it.
Live demos and deep dives
Book 1-on-1 meetings
Talks and panel sessions
Event recaps and photos
> See all events
Talk to a Netdata Human in <24 Hours
Sales, partnerships, press, or professional services—real engineers, fast answers.
Discuss your observability needs
Pricing and volume discounts
Partnership opportunities
Media and press inquiries
> Book a conversation
Your Data. Your Rules.
On-prem data, cloud control plane, transparent terms.
Trust & Scale
76,000+ GitHub Stars

One of the most popular open-source monitoring projects

SOC 2 Type 2 Certified

Enterprise-grade security and compliance

Data Sovereignty

Your metrics stay on your infrastructure

Validated
University of Amsterdam

"Most energy-efficient monitoring solution" — ICSOC 2023, peer-reviewed

ADASTEC (Autonomous Driving)

"Doesn't miss alerts—mission-critical trust for safety software"

Community Stats
615+ Contributors

Global community improving monitoring for everyone

1.5M+ Downloads/Day

Trusted by teams worldwide

GPLv3+ Licensed

Free forever, fully open source agent

Why Join?
Remote-First

Work from anywhere, async-friendly culture

Impact at Scale

Your work helps millions of systems

$ guides / coredns / coredns-per-replica-divergence ▌

Operations Guides

CoreDNS per-replica divergence: why averaged metrics hide a failing pod

Your CoreDNS dashboard looks slightly off. Average latency drifted up, SERVFAIL ratio is elevated but under the threshold, and nobody is being paged. Meanwhile, half the cluster’s DNS queries are slow or failing, because one of your two replicas is degraded and kube-proxy is still sending it traffic.

This is the per-replica divergence failure mode. CoreDNS in Kubernetes is almost never a singleton: the default deployment runs two replicas behind the kube-dns ClusterIP Service, and kube-proxy load-balances across them. Any aggregation that averages or sums across pods blends a sick replica’s numbers with healthy ones until the result looks like mild degradation instead of a partial outage.

The fix is not better thresholds on the aggregate. It is keeping per-pod series and alerting on divergence between replicas.

What this means

CoreDNS Prometheus metrics are per-process. Each replica exposes its own counters and histograms on its own :9153/metrics endpoint. Nothing inside CoreDNS knows about its sibling replica.

When you query average request duration or total SERVFAIL rate across all pods, you get the mean of two populations. If replica A answers at 2 ms and replica B at 400 ms, the average is 201 ms: bad, but often under the alert threshold, even though 50 percent of queries are taking 400 ms. The same math applies to error ratios, cache hit rates, and goroutine counts.

Two structural facts make this worse:

  • kube-proxy keeps sending traffic to a bad endpoint. Service load balancing removes an endpoint only for failing readiness, never for being slow. And readiness is a weak gate: neither /health nor /ready issues a real DNS query. A pod can be Ready and returning SERVFAIL for every lookup.
  • Stale routing after termination. When a CoreDNS pod terminates, kube-proxy updates its rules, but traffic can keep flowing to the dead pod IP through stale iptables/IPVS rules or stale UDP conntrack entries on the node. Those queries vanish. The surviving replica’s metrics stay green, and the dead pod emits nothing at all. The aggregate only shows a small throughput dip.
flowchart LR
  client[Client pods] --> svc[kube-dns ClusterIP]
  svc --> kp[kube-proxy rules]
  kp -->|healthy share| a[Replica A - healthy]
  kp -->|degraded share| b[Replica B - slow or failing]
  a --> agg[Averaged dashboard]
  b --> agg
  agg -->|looks slightly off| alert[No alert fires]

Common causes

CauseWhat it looks likeFirst thing to check
Node-local problem on one replica’s nodeOne pod has high latency or dropped queries; the other is clean. Often CPU throttling, UDP buffer drops, or conntrack pressure on that nodeCompare per-pod latency; check the sick pod’s node for UDP buffer errors and conntrack utilization
One replica lost its API watchOne pod serves stale or failing cluster.local answers; external names still work on bothCoreDNS logs on the sick pod for watch/list errors; coredns_kubernetes_rest_client_requests_total by pod and code
One replica has a bad upstream pathForward latency or healthcheck failures on one pod only, for example an egress path, ENI rate limit, or firewall asymmetrycoredns_forward_healthcheck_failures_total and coredns_forward_request_duration_seconds broken down per pod
kube-proxy or conntrack sending traffic to a terminated podClient-side DNS timeouts, aggregate QPS slightly low, no CoreDNS-side error anywhereCompare per-pod QPS against expected share; check for a recently terminated CoreDNS pod and node conntrack state
Uneven load distributionOne pod at significantly higher QPS than the other, saturating alonePer-pod coredns_dns_requests_total rate
Cold cache on one recently restarted podOne pod shows near-zero cache hit ratio and elevated latency for minutes after a rolloutCache hit ratio per pod correlated with pod start time

Quick checks

All commands are read-only. Run them against each replica individually, not through the Service.

# List CoreDNS pods and their nodes
kubectl get pods -n kube-system -l k8s-app=kube-dns -o wide

The CoreDNS container image is minimal (distroless/static): there is no shell, wget, or curl inside the pod, so kubectl exec will not work. Use kubectl port-forward to scrape one specific pod:

# Forward the metrics port of ONE pod (repeat per replica; Ctrl-C when done)
kubectl port-forward -n kube-system pod/<coredns-pod-a> 9153:9153 &

# Latency sum/count for this pod only
curl -s localhost:9153/metrics | grep -E '^coredns_dns_request_duration_seconds_(sum|count)'

# SERVFAIL responses per pod
curl -s localhost:9153/metrics | grep 'coredns_dns_responses_total' | grep SERVFAIL

# Per-pod cache state
curl -s localhost:9153/metrics | grep -E 'coredns_cache_(hits|requests)_total'

# Per-pod goroutines and heap
curl -s localhost:9153/metrics | grep -E '^go_goroutines|^go_memstats_heap_inuse_bytes'

# Readiness of each pod independently
kubectl port-forward -n kube-system pod/<coredns-pod-a> 8181:8181 &
curl -s localhost:8181/ready

# Recent restarts (a restarted pod explains a cold cache; restart loops explain QPS imbalance)
kubectl get pods -n kube-system -l k8s-app=kube-dns

Also check the nodes hosting CoreDNS pods for the infra-level causes that never appear in CoreDNS metrics:

# UDP receive buffer errors on the node (packets dropped before CoreDNS sees them)
netstat -su | grep -iE 'rcvbuferrors|receive errors'

# Conntrack pressure
cat /proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_count
cat /proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_max
dmesg | grep "nf_conntrack: table full"

How to diagnose it

  1. Confirm divergence exists. Take any latency, error, or QPS query you normally run and re-run it grouped by pod. If you do not have a pod or instance label on your CoreDNS series, that is the first thing to fix: the server label on CoreDNS metrics is the listen address (both pods typically report the same value, for example dns://:53), so it cannot distinguish replicas. Your scrape configuration must attach pod identity, for example via Prometheus kubernetes_sd_configs with role: pod and relabeling the pod name onto a label; the exact relabel rules depend on the scraping setup you use.

  2. Check QPS symmetry first. rate(coredns_dns_requests_total[5m]) per pod. Replicas behind a ClusterIP should carry roughly equal share over time. A pod carrying far less traffic may be out of the endpoints list, or traffic may be routed somewhere dead (stale kube-proxy rules or stale conntrack entries pointing at a terminated pod IP). A pod carrying far more may be saturating alone.

  3. Compare error ratios per pod, not absolute counts. A pod serving half the traffic will naturally have half the SERVFAILs. Compare SERVFAIL / total responses within each pod. Also check the plugin label on coredns_dns_responses_total per pod: SERVFAILs from the forward plugin point at upstreams, from the kubernetes plugin at API state.

  4. Compare latency distributions per pod. Use histogram_quantile over coredns_dns_request_duration_seconds grouped by pod. One pod with elevated P99 and normal P50 suggests upstream slowness or GC pressure on that pod; elevated P50 suggests systemic saturation (CPU, throttling) on its node.

  5. If one pod is sick, classify the cause. Work through the causes table: node-level infra (UDP buffer errors, conntrack), upstream path (per-pod coredns_forward_healthcheck_failures_total and coredns_forward_request_duration_seconds{to=...}), API watch (per-pod coredns_kubernetes_rest_client_requests_total by code, plus pod logs), cold cache (pod age vs coredns_cache_hits_total / coredns_cache_requests_total). Note: the forward plugin has always exposed coredns_forward_* metric names; only the old proxy plugin (removed from the default build in 1.5.0) exported coredns_proxy_*, so on current releases use the coredns_forward_* names.

  6. If both pods look clean but clients still time out, suspect the routing layer. Check whether a CoreDNS pod was recently terminated. Stale kube-proxy rules or stale UDP conntrack entries can keep sending queries to the dead pod IP; the surviving replica reports green while a fraction of queries disappear. Verify with client-side evidence: application DNS latency histograms, or a synthetic lookup loop from a pod on the affected node.

Metrics and signals to monitor

The rule for every signal below: keep the per-pod series and alert on divergence between replicas, not on the cluster-wide mean.

SignalWhy it mattersWarning sign
coredns_dns_requests_total per podDetects asymmetric load and traffic routed to dead endpointsSustained imbalance between replicas, or one pod near zero while it is Running and Ready
coredns_dns_responses_total{rcode="SERVFAIL"} per podThe real availability signal, per replicaSERVFAIL ratio diverging between pods by more than a few tenths of a percent
coredns_dns_request_duration_seconds per podPer-replica latency distributionP99 on one pod several times higher than its sibling
coredns_forward_healthcheck_failures_total per podIsolates a bad upstream path affecting one replicaFailures incrementing on one pod only
coredns_kubernetes_rest_client_requests_total per pod by codeDetects one pod with a broken API watch serving stale data5xx or connection errors on one pod, or 403s
Cache hit ratio per podCatches one cold or evicting cache dragging half the queriesOne pod far below the other, not explained by a recent restart
go_goroutines and go_memstats_heap_inuse_bytes per podBlocked-upstream accumulation or leaks on one replicaOne pod trending away from its sibling without a QPS explanation
Node-level UDP buffer errors and conntrack utilization per CoreDNS nodeThe infra causes CoreDNS cannot seeRcvbufErrors incrementing, conntrack above 80 percent of max on one node

For the alert itself: compare each pod against the replica set, not against a static threshold. A practical pattern is alerting when a pod’s error ratio or P99 exceeds the median of its peers by a meaningful multiple for a sustained window. Exact PromQL depends on your label schema, so validate it against your own series before relying on it.

Fixes

One replica degraded by its node

Move the pod: delete it and let the Deployment reschedule, ideally onto a different node. Use pod anti-affinity so replicas never share a node; a node-level problem (conntrack exhaustion, CPU contention, UDP buffer pressure) should not be able to take both replicas at once. Then fix the node cause itself, for example raising UDP receive buffers or conntrack limits.

Stale routing to a terminated pod

Short term, flushing the stale conntrack entries on affected nodes stops the bleeding. This is disruptive: deleting conntrack entries kills the flows they track, so scope it to the dead pod IP and UDP only, and expect brief disruption to matching traffic:

# Disruptive. Match only the dead pod IP as reply source, UDP only.
conntrack -D -p udp --reply-src <dead-pod-ip>

Longer term, keep kube-proxy and the kernel current (conntrack cleanup behavior has had known regressions), and consider NodeLocal DNSCache, which removes the NAT/conntrack hop for DNS entirely.

One replica with a broken API watch

Restart the pod to force a fresh re-list, then find out why the watch broke: API server health, RBAC, or a NetworkPolicy blocking CoreDNS to the API server. If you restart as the first move without capturing logs, you lose the evidence.

Cold cache after a rolling update

Not a bug, but a self-inflicted divergence: stagger rollouts with maxUnavailable=1 and a PodDisruptionBudget so you never flush both caches at once. See the related guide on cache collapse.

Scrape configuration

If you cannot see per-pod series at all, fix the scrape: per-pod scraping with pod identity labels, never scraping through the kube-dns Service (that hits one random backend and gives you a load-balanced sample of the truth). This is the highest-leverage fix in this article because everything else depends on it.

Prevention

  • Alert on replica divergence for error ratio, P99 latency, and QPS share, in addition to any aggregate alerts.
  • Per-pod dashboards by default. Any CoreDNS panel that shows an average should have a per-pod breakdown next to it.
  • Anti-affinity across nodes for CoreDNS replicas, so node failures and node-local resource pressure cannot degrade both.
  • Staggered rollouts with maxUnavailable=1 and a PDB.
  • Synthetic freshness and resolution checks per replica where possible, since readiness does not test DNS answers.
  • Client-side DNS latency visibility. CoreDNS processing time excludes kernel buffer waits, throttling, conntrack drops, and network transit; the application-observed number is the one that catches routing-layer divergence.

How Netdata helps

  • Per-instance series preserved: Netdata keeps CoreDNS metrics broken out per pod/instance rather than collapsing them into a cluster aggregate, so a single degraded replica stays visible as its own line instead of diluting into the mean.
  • Replica-to-replica divergence at a glance: plotting coredns_dns_requests_total, SERVFAIL responses, and request duration per instance on the same chart makes QPS imbalance and latency splits obvious within seconds.
  • Correlation across layers on one node view: when one replica is slow because of its node, Netdata’s node-level metrics (UDP buffer errors, conntrack utilization, CPU throttling) sit next to the CoreDNS charts, so the “pod or node?” question gets answered without switching tools.
  • ML anomaly detection per series: anomaly scoring runs on each per-pod series independently, so a replica drifting away from its own baseline gets flagged even when the aggregate stays inside static thresholds.
  • Per-second granularity: brief divergence windows during rollouts or upstream flaps are not averaged away by coarse scrape intervals.