The only agent that thinks for itself

Autonomous Monitoring with self-learning AI built-in, operating independently across your entire stack.

Unlimited Metrics & Logs
Machine learning & MCP
5% CPU, 150MB RAM
3GB disk, >1 year retention
800+ integrations, zero config
Dashboards, alerts out of the box
> Discover Netdata Agents

Centralized metrics streaming and storage

Aggregate metrics from multiple agents into centralized Parent nodes for unified monitoring across your infrastructure.

Stream from unlimited agents
Long-term data retention
High availability clustering
Data replication & backup
Scalable architecture
Enterprise-grade security
> Learn about Parents

Fully managed cloud platform

Access your monitoring data from anywhere with our SaaS platform. No infrastructure to manage, automatic updates, and global availability.

Zero infrastructure management
99.9% uptime SLA
Global data centers
Automatic updates & patches
Enterprise SSO & RBAC
SOC2 & ISO certified
> Explore Netdata Cloud

Deploy Netdata Cloud in your infrastructure

Run the full Netdata Cloud platform on-premises for complete data sovereignty and compliance with your security policies.

Complete data sovereignty
Air-gapped deployment
Custom compliance controls
Private network integration
Dedicated support team
Kubernetes & Docker support
> Learn about Cloud On-Premises

Powerful, intuitive monitoring interface

Modern, responsive UI built for real-time troubleshooting with customizable dashboards and advanced visualization capabilities.

Real-time chart updates
Customizable dashboards
Dark & light themes
Advanced filtering & search
Responsive on all devices
Collaboration features
> Explore Netdata UI

Monitor on the go

Native iOS and Android apps bring full monitoring capabilities to your mobile device with real-time alerts and notifications.

iOS & Android apps
Push notifications
Touch-optimized interface
Offline data access
Biometric authentication
Widget support
> Download apps

The future of infrastructure observability

See our strategic direction across AI-native observability, full-stack signals, operational intelligence, and enterprise platform maturity.

AI-native observability
Full-stack signal coverage
Operational intelligence
Enterprise platform maturity
Agent releases every 6 weeks
Cloud continuous delivery
> Explore Product Roadmap

Best energy efficiency

True real-time per-second

100% automated zero config

Centralized observability

Multi-year retention

High availability built-in

Zero maintenance

Always up-to-date

Enterprise security

Complete data control

Air-gap ready

Compliance certified

Millisecond responsiveness

Infinite zoom & pan

Works on any device

Native performance

Instant alerts

Monitor anywhere

AI-native observability

Continuous delivery

Open source foundation

80% Faster Incident Resolution

AI-powered troubleshooting from detection, to root cause and blast radius identification, to reporting.

True Real-Time and Simple, even at Scale

Linearly and infinitely scalable full-stack observability, that can be deployed even mid-crisis.

90% Cost Reduction, Full Fidelity

Instead of centralizing the data, Netdata distributes the code, eliminating pipelines and complexity.

See and Map Your Entire Network

Live topology, flow analytics, and SNMP device and trap monitoring — unified with your full-stack observability.

Control Without Surrender

SOC 2 Type 2 certified with every metric kept on your infrastructure.

Integrations

800+ collectors and notification channels, auto-discovered and ready out of the box.

800+ data collectors
Auto-discovery & zero config
Cloud, infra, app protocols
Notifications out of the box
> Explore integrations
Real Results
46% Cost Reduction

Reduced monitoring costs by 46% while cutting staff overhead by 67%.

— Leonardo Antunez, Codyas

Zero Pipeline

No data shipping. No central storage costs. Query at the edge.

From Our Users
"Out-of-the-Box"

So many out-of-the-box features! I mostly don't have to develop anything.

— Simon Beginn, LANCOM Systems

No Query Language

Point-and-click troubleshooting. No PromQL, no LogQL, no learning curve.

Enterprise Ready
67% Less Staff, 46% Cost Cut

Enterprise efficiency without enterprise complexity—real ROI from day one.

— Leonardo Antunez, Codyas

SOC 2 Type 2 Certified

Zero data egress. Only metadata reaches the cloud. Your metrics stay on your infrastructure.

Full Coverage
800+ Collectors

Auto-discovered and configured. No manual setup required.

Any Notification Channel

Slack, PagerDuty, Teams, email, webhooks—all built-in.

Built for the People Who Get Paged

Because 3am alerts deserve instant answers, not hour-long hunts.

Every Industry Has Rules. We Master Them.

See how healthcare, finance, and government teams cut monitoring costs 90% while staying audit-ready.

Monitor Any Technology. Configure Nothing.

Install the agent. It already knows your stack.
From Our Users
"A Rare Unicorn"

Netdata gives more than you invest in it. A rare unicorn that obeys the Pareto rule.

— Eduard Porquet Mateu, TMB Barcelona

99% Downtime Reduction

Reduced website downtime by 99% and cloud bill by 30% using Netdata alerts.

— Falkland Islands Government

Real Savings
30% Cloud Cost Reduction

Optimized resource allocation based on Netdata alerts cut cloud spending by 30%.

— Falkland Islands Government

46% Cost Cut

Reduced monitoring staff by 67% while cutting operational costs by 46%.

— Codyas

Real Coverage
"Plugin for Everything"

Netdata has agent capacity or a plugin for everything, including Windows and Kubernetes.

— Eduard Porquet Mateu, TMB Barcelona

"Out-of-the-Box"

So many out-of-the-box features! I mostly don't have to develop anything.

— Simon Beginn, LANCOM Systems

Real Speed
Troubleshooting in 30 Seconds

From 2-3 minutes to 30 seconds—instant visibility into any node issue.

— Matthew Artist, Nodecraft

20% Downtime Reduction

20% less downtime and 40% budget optimization from out-of-the-box monitoring.

— Simon Beginn, LANCOM Systems

Pay per Node. Unlimited Everything Else.

One price per node. Unlimited metrics, logs, users, and retention. No per-GB surprises.

Free tier—forever
No metric limits or caps
Retention you control
Cancel anytime
> See pricing plans

What's Your Monitoring Really Costing You?

Most teams overpay by 40-60%. Let's find out why.

Expose hidden metric charges
Calculate tool consolidation
Customers report 30-67% savings
Results in under 60 seconds
> See what you're really paying

Your Infrastructure Is Unique. Let's Talk.

Because monitoring 10 nodes is different from monitoring 10,000.

On-prem & air-gapped deployment
Volume pricing & agreements
Architecture review for your scale
Compliance & security support
> Start a conversation

Monitoring That Sells Itself

Deploy in minutes. Impress clients in hours. Earn recurring revenue for years.

30-second live demos close deals
Zero config = zero support burden
Competitive margins & deal protection
Response in 48 hours
> Apply to partner

Per-Second Metrics at Homelab Prices

Same engine, same dashboards, same ML. Just priced for tinkerers.

Community: Free forever · 5 nodes · non-commercial
Homelab: $90/yr · unlimited nodes · fair usage
> Get the Homelab Plan

$1,000 Per Referral. Unlimited Referrals.

Your colleagues get 10% off. You get 10% commission. Everyone wins.

10% of subscriptions, up to $1,000 each
Track earnings inside Netdata Cloud
PayPal/Venmo payouts in 3-4 weeks
No caps, no complexity
> Get your referral link
Cost Proof
40% Budget Optimization

"Netdata's significant positive impact" — LANCOM Systems

Calculate Your Savings

Compare vs Datadog, Grafana, Dynatrace

Savings Proof
46% Cost Reduction

"Cut costs by 46%, staff by 67%" — Codyas

30% Cloud Bill Savings

"Reduced cloud bill by 30%" — Falkland Islands Gov

Enterprise Proof
"Better Than Combined Alternatives"

"Better observability with Netdata than combining other tools." — TMB Barcelona

Real Engineers, <24h Response

DPA, SLAs, on-prem, volume pricing

Why Partners Win
Demo Live Infrastructure

One command, 30 seconds, real data—no sandbox needed

Zero Tickets, High Margins

Auto-config + per-node pricing = predictable profit

Homelab Ready
Free Video Course

8-episode Netdata tutorial by LearnLinux.tv

76k+ GitHub Stars

3rd most starred monitoring project

Worth Recommending
Product That Delivers

Customers report 40-67% cost cuts, 99% downtime reduction

Zero Risk to Your Rep

Free tier lets them try before they buy

AI Support Assistant, Available 24/7

Nedi has access to all official documentation, source code, and resources. Ask any question about Netdata—responds in your language.

Deployment & configuration
Troubleshooting & sizing
Alerts & notifications
Evidence-based answers
> Ask Nedi now

Never Fight Fires Alone

Docs, community, and expert help—pick your path to resolution.

Learn.netdata.cloud docs
Discord, Forums, GitHub
Premium support available
> Get answers now

60 Seconds to First Dashboard

One command to install. Zero config. 850+ integrations documented.

Linux, Windows, K8s, Docker
Auto-discovers your stack
> Read our documentation

76,000+ Engineers Strong

615+ contributors. 1.5M daily downloads. One mission: simplify observability.

Per-Second. 90% Cheaper. Data Stays Home.

Side-by-side comparisons: costs, real-time granularity, and data sovereignty for every major tool.

See why teams switch from Datadog, Prometheus, Grafana, and more.

> Browse all comparisons
Edge-Native Observability, Born Open Source
Per-second visibility, ML on every metric, and data that never leaves your infrastructure.
Founded in 2016
615+ contributors worldwide
Remote-first, engineering-driven
Open source first
> Read our story
Promises We Publish—and Prove
12 principles backed by open code, independent validation, and measurable outcomes.
Open source, peer-reviewed
Zero config, instant value
Data sovereignty by design
Aligned pricing, no surprises
> See all 12 principles
Edge-Native, AI-Ready, 100% Open
76k+ stars. Full ML, AI, and automation—GPLv3+, not premium add-ons.
76,000+ GitHub stars
GPLv3+ licensed forever
ML on every metric, included
Zero vendor lock-in
> Explore our open source
Build Real-Time Observability for the World
Remote-first team shipping per-second monitoring with ML on every metric.
Remote-first, fully distributed
Open source (76k+ stars)
Challenging technical problems
Your code on millions of systems
> See open roles
Meet the Team Behind Netdata
Conferences, meetups, and tradeshows where you can see Netdata in action and talk to the engineers who build it.
Live demos and deep dives
Book 1-on-1 meetings
Talks and panel sessions
Event recaps and photos
> See all events
Talk to a Netdata Human in <24 Hours
Sales, partnerships, press, or professional services—real engineers, fast answers.
Discuss your observability needs
Pricing and volume discounts
Partnership opportunities
Media and press inquiries
> Book a conversation
Your Data. Your Rules.
On-prem data, cloud control plane, transparent terms.
Trust & Scale
76,000+ GitHub Stars

One of the most popular open-source monitoring projects

SOC 2 Type 2 Certified

Enterprise-grade security and compliance

Data Sovereignty

Your metrics stay on your infrastructure

Validated
University of Amsterdam

"Most energy-efficient monitoring solution" — ICSOC 2023, peer-reviewed

ADASTEC (Autonomous Driving)

"Doesn't miss alerts—mission-critical trust for safety software"

Community Stats
615+ Contributors

Global community improving monitoring for everyone

1.5M+ Downloads/Day

Trusted by teams worldwide

GPLv3+ Licensed

Free forever, fully open source agent

Why Join?
Remote-First

Work from anywhere, async-friendly culture

Impact at Scale

Your work helps millions of systems

$ guides / fluentd / fluentd-silent-data-loss ▌

Operations Guides

Fluentd silent data loss: logs missing downstream with no error at all

Someone queries the log store for an incident window and the logs are not there. Not delayed, not misindexed: missing. You check Fluentd. The process is running, retry_count is zero, no error logs, buffer metrics look unremarkable. Everything is green, and the data is gone.

This is the hardest Fluentd failure to detect because it is designed into the defaults. When the buffer fills and overflow_action is throw_exception (the default), new events are rejected at the input and lost. When overflow_action is drop_oldest_chunk, chunks are discarded with only a log warning and one counter that almost nobody alerts on. Parse failures can drop records with no visible trace if the error stream is not routed anywhere. In all three cases the pipeline looks healthy from every angle except the one that matters: the destination.

You cannot detect this from any single metric. You detect it by comparing input emit_records against output emit_records over a window, watching buffer space ratios, and verifying end-to-end at the destination.

What this means

Fluentd’s delivery guarantee is not “every event arrives.” It is “every event the buffer accepts will be retried until delivered or exhausted.” Data loss happens at the boundaries that guarantee does not cover:

  1. At the buffer boundary. When buffer_total_queued_size reaches total_limit_size, the overflow_action fires. With the default throw_exception, an exception is raised back into the input plugin and the event is lost. With drop_oldest_chunk, the oldest queued chunk is discarded to make room. Neither path produces a retry or an error-level log.

  2. At the parser boundary. A record that fails to parse can be dropped before it ever reaches the buffer. Whether it lands anywhere depends on whether error events are routed (the @ERROR label) and whether anything is listening there.

  3. At the routing boundary. A misconfigured <match> can send events to a null output or the wrong destination. Input and output rates look perfectly healthy. The data simply arrives somewhere nobody looks.

flowchart TD
  A[Events arrive at input] --> B{Buffer has space?}
  B -->|yes| C[Chunk staged, queued, flushed]
  C --> D[Destination]
  B -->|no, throw_exception default| E[Exception at input - event lost - no counter]
  B -->|no, drop_oldest_chunk| F[Oldest chunk discarded - drop_oldest_chunk_count increments]
  B -->|no, block| G[Input thread stalls - backpressure upstream]
  A --> H{Parse OK?}
  H -->|no, no @ERROR label route| I[Record dropped silently]
  C --> J{Match routes correctly?}
  J -->|no| K[Null or wrong output - metrics stay green]

The common thread: the process stays alive, retry metrics stay flat, and the only evidence is a gap between what went in and what came out, or a hole in the destination.

Common causes

CauseWhat it looks likeFirst thing to check
Buffer full with throw_exception (default)buffer_available_buffer_space_ratios at or near 0%, BufferOverflowError warnings in Fluentd’s own log, no error counters movingoverflow_action in the output’s buffer config; grep Fluentd log for BufferOverflowError
Buffer full with drop_oldest_chunkdrop_oldest_chunk_count incrementing, queue stays below max because chunks are being discardeddrop_oldest_chunk_count per output in monitor_agent
Parse failures dropping recordsInput emit_records lower than expected log volume, events never reach the bufferWhether error events are routed to a <label @ERROR> section; test a sample of raw log lines against the parser
Misrouted events (wrong or null match)All metrics healthy, data arriving at wrong index/destination or nowhereTrace one tag end-to-end; query the actual destination
Retry exhaustion discarding chunksHistorical retry_count spike, gap in destination data older than retry_timeoutFluentd log for chunk discard messages; write_secondary_count if a secondary is configured
in_tail throttling (group rate limits)throttled_log_count incrementing, input rate plateaued at a ceilingthrottled_log_count on the tail plugin (v1.17.1+)
Memory buffer lost on restart/crashGap in destination data aligned with a Fluentd restart or OOM killBuffer @type in config; dmesg for OOM events around the gap

Quick checks

All of these are read-only. They assume monitor_agent is enabled on port 24220 (per-worker ports auto-increment in multi-worker mode: 24220, 24221, …).

# 1. Compare input vs output record totals (the core check)
curl -s http://localhost:24220/api/plugins.json | \
  jq '[.plugins[] | select(.plugin_category=="input") | .emit_records // 0] | add'
curl -s http://localhost:24220/api/plugins.json | \
  jq '[.plugins[] | select(.plugin_category=="output") | .emit_records // 0] | add'

These are cumulative counters since process start, so compare deltas over a window, not raw totals. A sustained gap where input exceeds output, beyond what batching explains, is your loss signal. On Fluentd older than v1.19.0, input-side emit_records requires enable_input_metrics true in <system> (the default flipped to on in v1.19.0, PR #4966); without it the counter reads 0 and this check is impossible.

# 2. Buffer space remaining per output
curl -s http://localhost:24220/api/plugins.json | \
  jq '.plugins[] | select(.plugin_category=="output") | {id: .plugin_id, avail_pct: .buffer_available_buffer_space_ratios}'

Anything at or near 0% means the overflow_action is firing or about to fire.

# 3. Dropped chunks (only nonzero when overflow_action is drop_oldest_chunk)
curl -s http://localhost:24220/api/plugins.json | \
  jq '.plugins[] | select(.plugin_category=="output") | {id: .plugin_id, dropped: .drop_oldest_chunk_count}'

Any nonzero value is confirmed data loss.

# 4. Writes falling through to the secondary output
curl -s http://localhost:24220/api/plugins.json | \
  jq '.plugins[] | select(.plugin_category=="output") | {id: .plugin_id, secondary: .write_secondary_count}'
# 5. Grep Fluentd's own log for overflow and discard evidence
grep -iE "BufferOverflowError|drop_oldest_chunk|discard" /var/log/td-agent/td-agent.log | tail -30
# fluent-package path: /var/log/fluent/fluentd.log
# 6. Check which overflow_action each output is actually running
grep -B2 -A8 "overflow_action\|<buffer" /etc/td-agent/td-agent.conf
# fluent-package path: /etc/fluent/fluentd.conf

If overflow_action does not appear at all, you are running the default: throw_exception.

# 7. Verify end-to-end: query the destination for a known recent event
TIMESTAMP=$(date +%s)
echo "{\"silent_loss_check\":\"$TIMESTAMP\"}" | fluent-cat debug.silentloss
# Then search the destination for that timestamp value

If the synthetic event arrives but historical application events from the same window do not, the loss was real and bounded in time.

How to diagnose it

  1. Bound the loss window. At the destination, find the first and last timestamp of the gap. Everything else is easier once you know when it happened.

  2. Correlate the window with Fluentd’s own log. Look for BufferOverflowError warnings, “no queued chunks to be dropped”, retry exhaustion messages, or a restart/OOM at the start of the gap. Fluentd’s own log is the highest-signal artifact here because the metrics often show nothing.

  3. Check buffer state history. If you have time series on buffer_available_buffer_space_ratios, did it sit at or near 0% during the gap? If yes, you lost data at the buffer boundary regardless of which overflow_action is configured.

  4. Identify the configured overflow_action. throw_exception means new events were rejected at the input during the full period. drop_oldest_chunk means the oldest data was discarded, and drop_oldest_chunk_count tells you how many chunks. block means the loss, if any, happened upstream (for example UDP syslog packets dropped by the kernel while the input thread was stalled).

  5. Rule out parse drops. If the gap affects only specific log sources or formats, compare the volume of raw lines in the source files against input emit_records for that input over the same window. A shortfall with a healthy buffer points at the parser. Check whether the config has a <label @ERROR> section; without one, parse-failed records have nowhere to go.

  6. Rule out misrouting. If all Fluentd metrics look healthy for the window, inject a synthetic event on the affected tag and watch where it lands. If it arrives at an unexpected destination (or none), the problem is the match configuration, not delivery.

  7. Quantify the loss. For a full-buffer event, the lost volume is roughly input rate x duration of the overflow window. For drop_oldest_chunk, the chunk count times average records per chunk gives an estimate. You need this number for the incident review even though the data itself is unrecoverable.

One caution on interpretation: retry_count is a cumulative counter of emit errors since process start, not a current-state gauge, and the output plugin only ever increments it — it does not reset after a successful flush in any current Fluentd version. Do not treat a stale nonzero retry_count as evidence of an active problem, and do not treat retry_count of zero as proof nothing was lost.

Metrics and signals to monitor

SignalWhy it mattersWarning sign
Input emit_records vs output emit_records (rate over a window)The only reliable detector for silent loss. Sustained input > output means events are disappearing.Divergence over a window of at least max(2 x flush_interval, 10 minutes), with buffer queue not draining
buffer_available_buffer_space_ratiosTells you the overflow_action is firing or about to. This is the early warning before loss starts.Below 20% and falling; at or near 0% means loss is occurring now
drop_oldest_chunk_countDirect confirmation of discarded chunks.Any increment
emit_error_count (where exposed)Counts events that failed to emit into the pipeline. Field availability varies by version.Any nonzero rate
write_secondary_countPrimary output exhausted retries and data went to the fallback.Any nonzero value
write_count deltaA flat write_count with growing queue means the output is stalled and the buffer is filling toward overflow.delta(write_count) == 0 while input is active
buffer_oldest_timekeyAge of the oldest undelivered data. Quantifies how stale the backlog is.now minus oldest_timekey exceeds your delivery SLA
throttled_log_count (in_tail, v1.17.1+)Confirms source-side drops from group rate limiting.Any increment when rate limiting is configured

Fixes

Fix the buffer overflow path

The root fix is always the destination or the buffer sizing: a buffer that fills is a symptom of an output that cannot keep pace. See Fluentd buffer queue length growing for the throughput side and Fluentd BufferOverflowError for the acute overflow event.

For the loss behavior itself, choose the overflow_action deliberately per output instead of inheriting the default:

  • throw_exception (default): rejects new events at the input. Acceptable only if you monitor buffer space ratios tightly and treat approach-to-full as an incident.
  • block: stalls input threads, converting data loss into backpressure. Safer for data, but pushes the problem upstream (sender timeouts, kernel UDP drops). The official docs do not recommend block as the general answer; a secondary output or the @ERROR label is usually the better safety net.
  • drop_oldest_chunk: keeps the pipeline moving by discarding oldest data. Defensible for metrics-like logs, unacceptable for audit or security logs. If you use it, alerting on drop_oldest_chunk_count is mandatory, not optional.

Sizing changes that buy runway: increase total_limit_size (defaults are 512MB for memory buffers, 64GB for file buffers), and prefer file-backed buffers in production so a restart does not destroy the backlog. Memory buffers lose everything unflushed on crash or restart.

Fix the parse-drop path

Route parse failures somewhere visible. Ensure error events are captured by a <label @ERROR> section that writes to a file or a dead-letter destination, so a format change produces artifacts instead of silence. When an upstream application changes its log format, the volume into @ERROR is your detection signal.

Fix the misrouting path

Verify tag routing end-to-end after every config change: inject a synthetic event per tag with fluent-cat and confirm arrival at the intended destination. Treat “all metrics green but wrong destination” as a standard post-change check, not an exotic edge case.

Prevention

  • Alert on the input/output comparison. Compute both rates from monitor_agent, sum across plugins, and alert on sustained divergence over a window of at least max(2 x flush_interval, 10 minutes). Require input rate > 0 so idle hosts do not false-positive. This is the single most valuable alert in this entire article.
  • Alert on buffer space, not just queue depth. buffer_available_buffer_space_ratios below 20% and falling is a ticket; below 5% with a stalled write_count is a page. This fires before the loss starts.
  • Alert on drop_oldest_chunk_count and write_secondary_count at any increment. Both mean data already went somewhere other than the primary destination.
  • Enable input metrics. If input-side emit_records reads zero, set enable_input_metrics true in <system>, or the input side of the comparison is blind forever.
  • Make overflow_action an explicit, reviewed choice in every output’s buffer config. Never ship the default by accident.
  • Monitor Fluentd’s own log. BufferOverflowError and chunk-discard warnings appear there before any counter moves. The log pipeline’s own logs are often the first place this failure shows up.
  • Verify end-to-end routinely. Periodic synthetic events per tag, checked at the destination, catch the misrouting and parse-drop cases that no internal metric can see.
  • Use file-backed buffers with adequate disk headroom so restarts and OOM kills do not convert backpressure into permanent loss.

How Netdata helps

  • Netdata collects the monitor_agent fields that matter here (emit_records per plugin, buffer_available_buffer_space_ratios, drop_oldest_chunk_count, write_count, retry_count) as per-second time series, so the input-vs-output divergence becomes a visible, alertable comparison instead of a manual curl during an incident.
  • Per-second buffer space ratios show the approach to overflow minutes before the overflow_action fires, which is the only window where you can still prevent the loss.
  • Because every counter is retained as history, bounding the loss window after the fact (when did the gap start, how long did the buffer sit at 0%) is a dashboard query rather than log archaeology.
  • Correlating Fluentd’s buffer and emit metrics with host-level signals (process restarts, OOM kills, disk fill on the buffer partition) distinguishes “buffer overflow drop” from “memory buffer lost on restart” without switching tools.
  • Anomaly detection on per-plugin emit rates flags the shape of silent loss (input steady, output subtly lower) that fixed thresholds tend to miss.