HAProxy stick-table overflow: rate limiting that silently stops working
Your HAProxy config has rate limiting. It has session persistence. Both are enforced by stick tables, and both can stop working without an error counter, a log line, or a page.
Stick tables are fixed-size, in-memory key-value stores. When a table reaches its configured size, HAProxy has two possible behaviors and neither one alerts you. With the default configuration, HAProxy flushes expired entries to make room for new ones. If the table is full of entries that have not yet expired, new entries are refused. With the nopurge option, eviction is disabled entirely and new entries are silently rejected. In both paths, whatever the table was doing (rate limiting, sticky sessions, abuse tracking) degrades or stops for affected clients.
The way most teams find out: a DDoS or credential-stuffing wave succeeds despite rate limiting being configured. The config was correct. The table was full. This article covers how to confirm overflow, how the two overflow modes differ, and how to size and monitor tables so it never gets that far.
What this means
A stick table entry is created the first time HAProxy sees a key (typically a source IP via track-sc0 or http-request track-sc0 src). That entry carries counters: http_req_rate, conn_rate, gpc0, and so on. Every subsequent request from that key updates the entry, and ACLs read the counters to decide whether to deny, throttle, or pin the session.
When the table is full:
- Default (no
nopurge): HAProxy flushes a few of the oldest expired entries to release space. This is silent: no counter, no log. If the table is being filled faster than entries expire (for example, a botnet rotating through unique source IPs with a longexpire), eviction happens continuously and tracking effectively resets for evicted clients. Their rate counters vanish and they start fresh, which defeats the rate limit. - With
nopurge: No eviction occurs. New keys are refused. A new client’strack-sc0action fails silently: no entry exists, so no counters exist, so the rate-limit ACLs never trigger for that client. Rate limiting never activates for new clients at all.
Neither path increments dreq, dresp, or any other CSV stat. The stats page and the show stat CSV export contain no stick-table fields at all. The only visibility is the runtime API command show table.
flowchart TD
A[New key arrives] --> B{Table full?}
B -- No --> C[Entry created, counters tracked]
B -- Yes --> D{nopurge set?}
D -- No --> E{Expired entries exist?}
E -- Yes --> F[Oldest expired entries evicted - silent]
E -- No --> G[New entry refused - silent]
D -- Yes --> G
F --> H[Evicted client counters reset, rate limit defeated]
G --> I[New clients never tracked, rate limit never activates]One more multiplier: if you replicate tables via the peers subsystem, a full table on one node implies the peers are full too, because peers replicate the full table state. You cannot dodge the problem by failing over.
Common causes
| Cause | What it looks like | First thing to check |
|---|---|---|
Table size too small for real client cardinality | used pinned at or near size in show table | Compare used vs size; estimate unique keys per expire window |
expire too long for the traffic profile | Table fills with stale entries that outlive their usefulness | Entry timestamps in show table <name> output; ratio of new-key rate to expire window |
| DDoS or scan with many unique source IPs | Sudden fill coinciding with a session-rate spike | Frontend ConnRate and SessRate from show info; source IP distribution in show table <name> |
nopurge on a table sized for average, not peak | Rate limiting never engages for new clients during bursts | Table config; used at 100% while abuse traffic continues |
| Expired entries not being pruned (known bug on some versions) | used keeps climbing even as traffic drops; entries with expired timestamps linger | show table <name> twice: if the second call drops used, pruning was stuck. See diagnosis below |
Quick checks
All of these are read-only runtime API calls against the stats socket.
# List all stick tables with capacity and current entry count
echo "show table" | socat unix-connect:/var/run/haproxy.sock stdio
The summary line per table includes size:<capacity> and used:<current-entries>. Compute the ratio for every table. Anything above 80% is a problem forming; 100% is a problem already happening.
# Inspect a specific table's entries (keys, counters, expiry)
echo "show table <table_name>" | socat unix-connect:/var/run/haproxy.sock stdio | head -50
# Find sources already over your intended rate threshold
echo "show table <table_name> data.http_req_rate gt 50" | socat unix-connect:/var/run/haproxy.sock stdio
# Confirm whether a traffic surge coincides with the fill
echo "show info" | socat unix-connect:/var/run/haproxy.sock stdio | grep -E "^(ConnRate|SessRate|CurrConns):"
# If peers are configured, check replication state
echo "show peers" | socat unix-connect:/var/run/haproxy.sock stdio
# Check whether denials are still firing as expected
echo "show stat" | socat unix-connect:/var/run/haproxy.sock stdio | \
awk -F, '$2 == "FRONTEND" {print $1": dreq="$11" req_rate="$47}'
Note on that last check: the field positions assume the standard show stat CSV column order (dreq is column 11, req_rate is column 47 when splitting on commas). The expected symptom of overflow with nopurge is that dreq stops rising or drops relative to request rate, because new abusive clients are never tracked and therefore never denied. A healthy rate limiter under attack shows dreq climbing with the attack. A saturated table shows attack traffic rising while dreq stays flat.
How to diagnose it
Get utilization for every table. Run
show tableand recordusedandsizefor each. Any table at 100% is overflowing right now. Any table above 80% needs sizing work before the next peak.Determine which overflow mode you are in. Check the table’s
stick-tableline in the config fornopurge. If present, overflow means new keys are refused: expect new clients to be untracked. If absent, overflow means silent eviction of expired entries: expect tracked clients to lose their counters and effectively reset.Check whether eviction is keeping up. Sample
show tabletwice, a minute apart. Ifusedstays pinned atsizewhile you know new clients are arriving (frontend session rate is nonzero), entries are being created and evicted in a churn. Your rate window is effectively broken for anyone whose entry gets evicted before the ACL threshold trips.Look for the pruning bug. There is a known issue on HAProxy 2.7.x (and a related fixed one on 2.0.10-2.0.12, fixed in 2.0.13) where expired entries stop being pruned and
usedclimbs monotonically. The signature:usedkeeps growing even as traffic falls, and runningshow table <name>itself forces eviction on the next call, droppingused. If your monitoring pollsshow table, it may be masking the bug by forcing cleanup on every poll.Correlate with attack signals. Compare frontend
rate/req_ratetrends againstdreq. Under a real attack with a working rate limiter,dreqclimbs. Ifreq_ratefrom new sources is climbing anddreqis flat while the table sits at 100%, the limiter is defeated.Check the peers angle. If
peersreplication is configured, runshow tableon each peer. A full table on one node means all nodes are full. Fixing one node is not a fix.Estimate true cardinality. From
show table <name>, sample the key space. For IP-keyed tables, count distinct entries and compare against your expected unique-client count perexpirewindow. If the table holds entries for clients long gone,expireis too long. If it cannot hold one window’s worth of genuine clients,sizeis too small.
Metrics and signals to monitor
| Signal | Why it matters | Warning sign |
|---|---|---|
Stick table used / size ratio (via show table) | The only direct overflow signal; absent from CSV stats | > 80% sustained; 100% at any time on a security table |
dreq rate vs frontend req_rate | A working rate limiter under attack shows denials tracking the attack | Attack traffic rising while dreq stays flat |
Frontend ConnRate and SessRate (show info) | Distinguishes “table full because of attack” from “table full because undersized” | Spike in new connections from diverse sources coinciding with fill |
| New-entry creation rate vs expiry rate | Predicts overflow before it happens | Creation rate durably exceeds expiry rate at peak |
show peers connection state and per-peer table state | Peers replicate full state; a full table propagates | Peer disconnected, or peer tables also at capacity |
Per-source http_req_rate / conn_rate (show table <name> data...) | Confirms whether the limiter is actually seeing the abusers | Known-abusive sources absent from the table during an incident |
Fixes
Undersized table
Increase size on the stick-table line. Memory cost is modest: roughly 80-100 bytes per entry for IPv4 keys with rate counters, and around 50 bytes base plus key length for string keys. A 1M-entry IPv4 table is on the order of tens of megabytes. Size for peak unique keys per expire window plus headroom, not for average. This requires a reload to take effect; if you use peers, table definitions must match across peers.
Tradeoff: larger tables cost memory and slightly more lookup work, but this is almost always the right fix when cardinality estimates were wrong.
expire too long
Shorten expire so stale entries leave before the table fills. The right value is tied to your rate-limit window: entries only need to live slightly longer than the longest window your ACLs evaluate (for example, http_req_rate(60s) needs entries to survive a bit over 60 seconds of inactivity, not an hour).
Tradeoff: too short an expire breaks session persistence tables, where clients legitimately go idle between requests. Size persistence tables for expire equal to your real session idle tolerance, and keep rate-limit tables on short expiry.
Attack-driven fill
If unique-source floods are the cause, sizing alone loses: an attacker controls cardinality and can fill any finite table. Shorten expire so entries churn quickly, consider tracking a coarser key (an IPv6 prefix rather than a full address, if you key on IPv6), and add upstream filtering so HAProxy is not the first line absorbing a cardinality attack. IPv6 diversity makes per-IP tracking weak in general; attackers can rotate through enormous address space.
nopurge behavior is wrong for your use case
If the table exists for rate limiting, silent refusal of new entries is usually the worse failure mode: new attackers are never tracked. Removing nopurge restores eviction-based behavior, which at least keeps the limiter working for tracked clients. If you genuinely need strict admission (no eviction ever), then monitoring the used/size ratio with an alert is not optional; it is the only way you will know the table stopped accepting entries.
Stuck pruning (version bug)
If you confirmed expired entries are not being pruned, upgrading past the affected version is the durable fix. As an operational workaround, periodic show table <name> calls force eviction, which is why some monitoring scripts accidentally mask the bug. Treat the workaround as temporary.
Prevention
- Collect
show tableon a schedule. This data is not inshow statCSV output and not on the stats page. Scrape it via the runtime socket, recordusedandsizeper table, and graph the ratio. - Alert at 80% utilization. Page-worthy at 100% for any table serving rate limiting or security functions, ticket-worthy above 80% for everything else. The 80% line gives you time to resize before the limiter silently degrades.
- Alert on the
dreqdivergence. During known attack traffic, a flat or fallingdreqagainst risingreq_rateis the behavioral signature of a defeated limiter. This catches overflow even if yourshow tablecollection lapses. - Size from measurement, not guesses. After a few weeks of production traffic, measure unique keys per
expirewindow at peak and setsizeto at least 2x that. Revisit after traffic growth, launches, or marketing events. - Match
expireto the enforcement window. Rate-limit tables: slightly longer than the longest rate window. Persistence tables: the real session idle tolerance. Do not copy one table’sexpireto another. - Monitor all peers. Because peers replicate full table state, alert on the worst peer, not the average.
- Rehearse the failure. Periodically fill a test table in staging and confirm which failure mode your config produces. Knowing in advance whether your limiter fails open (untracked new clients) or churns (evicted counters) changes your incident response.
How Netdata helps
- Netdata collects the HAProxy runtime API signals that surround a stick-table overflow: frontend session and request rates,
dreq, and per-frontend error counters, so you can see attack traffic rising while denials stay flat. - Correlating
dreqagainstreq_rateon the same dashboard turns the behavioral signature of a defeated rate limiter into something visible in seconds instead of a postmortem finding. - Because stick-table utilization is not in the CSV stats, pairing Netdata’s HAProxy charts with a scheduled
show tablescrape closes the instrumentation gap; Netdata’s alerting can then watch the utilization ratio and fire at your 80% threshold. - Per-second granularity on session-rate and connection-rate charts makes it easy to line up the moment a table filled with the traffic event that filled it, which is the difference between “undersized table” and “cardinality attack.”
Related guides
- HAProxy 502 Bad Gateway: backend connection and response failures
- HAProxy 503 Service Unavailable: no server is available to handle this request
- HAProxy 504 Gateway Timeout: timeout server and the backend timeout cascade
- HAProxy backend losing servers: active server count and cascade risk
- HAProxy backend queue building (qcur): requests waiting for a free server slot
- HAProxy bandwidth (bin/bout): bytes in, bytes out, and capacity planning
- HAProxy compression overhead: comp_byp, CPU cost, and when compression backfires
- HAProxy connect time (ctime) high: network latency and backend accept-queue overflow
- HAProxy connection errors (econ): backend connections refused, timed out, or reset
- HAProxy connection reuse dropping: http-reuse, pooling, and handshake overhead
- HAProxy scur approaching slim: the concurrent-session saturation signal
- HAProxy ephemeral port exhaustion: TIME_WAIT and backend connection churn






